Gordon Dirks, the recipient of anti-Christian bigotry?

Gordon Dirks, the recipient of anti-Christian bigotry?


Arguably, values and actions are not often easily teased apart: actions, the tangible product of one’s values, do not deviate far from deeply held convictions. For example, the lifelong Muslim is unlikely to fry up some bacon for a BLT and the born-again Christian is unlikely to devote their Saturday evening to the Ouija board.

This is perhaps what is worrying some Albertans concerned about the new minister of education, Gordon Dirks. Journalist Licia Corbella has labeled the opposition Gordon Dirks has experienced through social media “open, anti-Christian bigotry”. Are these concerns justified or are these merciless bigots taking a stab at the new minister based on his personal faith?

Dirks, armed with both experience as a Calgary Board of Education trustee and post-secondary education from Saskatchewan, is distrusted due to having spent some time doing administrative work for a couple of Bible colleges. One has questioned if Dirks could meet “the goals of our secular public school system”. Another has said, “This is not very good. Bible college admin in the past”.

These concerns are perhaps legitimate: if a Muslim had been selected, no doubt he would receive a deluge of criticism. Religious beliefs and values have the potential to steer one’s actions and hence, leach into one’s career and influence professional decisions.

This point deserves emphasis: religious beliefs have the potential to influence professional decisions. Ideally, all of us will set aside our personal convictions, whether rooted in religious values or otherwise, when we step into our professional shoes.

Two hazards arise if the ability to obtain a professional position were hampered by beliefs or practices outside professional time. The workplace may become an arena of distrust and secrecy. In place of open honesty, employees would have an incentive to keep quiet about their beliefs to ensure their daily bread. Additionally, denying a job to a potential employee on the basis of what they do, practice, or believe outside of work is straight up discrimination.

Having addressed these hazards, it is worthwhile to return to the point made earlier: beliefs, rooted in religion or otherwise, do have the potential to influence work related decisions. To circumvent this, accountability is crucial.

Should Gordon Dirks put forward changes that discriminate on the basis of his personal religious convictions, outrage is justified. Until then, Albertans may not be justified in their objection purely on the basis of the new minister’s religious beliefs.


2 thoughts on “Gordon Dirks, the recipient of anti-Christian bigotry?

  1. The two types of particles put forward in this article are, I believe, erroneously given equal credence. The particles associated with the Standard Model (sub-nuclear particles), though seemingly invisible and quite mysterious, have been placed into the model because they adequately explain observed phenomena. Conversely, no phenomena have been observed that require a model containing the atma. If ghosts have been observed, studied and analyzed (not mere unverifiable eyewitness accounts), requiring a model for explanation that the atma could provide, this Vedic particle may gain far more recognition and respect.

  2. Gordon Dirk should not be denied opportunity, due to his religious values, to fulfill the responsibilities as Alberta Education Minster because that is discrimination. I agree with the arguments stated in this blog to support Dirk, however to suggest the minister will remain “non-judgmental and objective” would be neglecting the concept of worldviews. Worldviews are
    connected to philosophies, the rationale or logic behind our thinking, and will influence our actions. Looking at Walter’s article “On the Idea of Worldview and its relation to Philosophy,” worldviews can “yield or are equivalent to” philosophy (pg. 3). If worldview produces our logic or is equal to how we rationalize, Gordon Dirk will not be completely objective as he will see things through a Christian lens. Though, complete objectivity is nearly impossible and Dirk should not be blamed. This is why it is increasingly important to understand a person’s background so we can critically assess their behavior/actions. The question is not if religious individuals should be public figures, but if the sacred and secularized can be separated. Even doctors may be unable to separate the two, like the Calgary doctor who refused to prescribe birth control pills because it was against her religion. In Dirk’s case, his prior experience would reveal that if he had any intention of converting or disrespecting youth, it would have been done already being the former chairman of the CBE. One must still wonder if the Alberta Minster of Education was a regular practitioner of African traditions involving sorcerer or witchcraft, would he still be given the opportunity?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s